References & resources

References about this project


Davis, L., Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N. & Leach, J. (2009). New Media to Develop Graduate Attributes of Science Students. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009.http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/davis-interactive-session.pdf
Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N., Leach, J., Davis, L. & Orthia, L. (2009). Motivate students by having them publish in new media:
An invitation to science lecturers to share and test. 2009 Uniserve Science Proceedings. Available at http://science.uniserve.edu.au/images/content/2009_papers/rifkin.pdf
.

Rifkin W., Longnecker N, Leach, J., Davis, L. & Orthia, L. (2010). Students Publishing in New Media: Eight Hypotheses – a House of Cards? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 18: 43-54 http://escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/CAL/article/viewFile/3529/5422


Other Useful references

Australian Council of Deans of Science (2001). What did you do with your science degree? A national study of employment outcomes for science degree holders 1990-2000. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
Chesterton, P and Cummings, R. (2007) ALTC Grants Scheme – Evaluating Projects. Accessed on 26 April 2009 at: http://www.murdoch.edu.au/teach/carrick_evaluation/evaluation_plan.pdf
Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C-j, and Cragnolini, V. (2004). "Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: graduates’ perceptions," Higher Education Research and Development, 23(2), 147-165.
Cronbach, L.J. et.al. (1980) Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davies, S. (2008). "Learning to Engage; Engaging to Learn: The Purposes of Informal Science-Public Dialogue." In Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for public engagement and popular media, eds. R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, and J. Thomas. Oxford University Press.
Dumlao, R. and Duke, S.
(2003). “The Web and E-Mail in Science Communication,” Science Communication, 24: 283 - 308.
Educating the Net Generation. (2008). Implementation. Retrieved 25 April, 2009 fromhttp://netgen.unimelb.edu.au/implementation/index.html
ENSCOT Team (2003). “ENSCOT: The European network of science communication teachers,” Public Understanding of Science, 12, 167 - 181.
Gosper, M., Green, D., McNeill, M., Phillips, R., Preston, G., Woo, K. (2008). The Impact of Web-Based Lecture Technologies on Current and Future Practices in Learning and Teaching,http://www.cpd.mq.edu.au/teaching/wblt/overview.htm, Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Sydney.
Hutton, P. and Pluske, J. (2005). University units specialising in scientific communication are valuable for teaching generic skills. Report for UWA Teaching Intern project. CATL. U of Western Australia.
Jasanoff, S. (1998). “Coming of Age in Science and Technology Studies,” Science Communication, 20, 91-98.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K.L., Bishop, A., Chang, R. & Churchwood, A. (2007).The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 517-525). Accessed from:http://netgen.unimelb.edu.au/publications/published.html 25 April, 2009.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and Natives: Investigating differences between staff and students' use of technology. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008. Accessed from:http://netgen.unimelb.edu.au/publications/published.html 25 April, 2009.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
McKenzie, J., Alexander, S., Harper, C., and Anderson, S. (2005). Dissemination, adoption and adaptation of project innovation in higher education. Carrick Institute of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.http://www.carrickinstitute.edu.au/carrick/webdav/site/carricksite/users/siteadmin/ public/Dissemination,%20Adoption%20and%20Adaption.pdf
Mulder, H., Longnecker, N., and Davis, L. (2008). “The State of Science Communication Programs at Universities Around the World,” Science Communication 30(2): 277- 287.
Rifkin, W. (2007). “Beyond Words.” In Designing Information and Organizations with a Positive Lens: Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, Vol. 2, eds. M. Avital, R. Boland, and D. Cooperrider, Elsevier, 189-204.
Rifkin, W. (2004) “Worldwide Day in Science,” Learning and Teaching Support Network Bioscience Bulletin, UK Higher Education Academy, Spring.
Scriven, M. (1967) “The Methodology of Evaluation,” in R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gagne and M. Scriven, eds. Perspectives on Curriculum Evaluation, AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 1, Chicago: Rand McNally.
Southwell, D., Gannaway, D., Orrell, J., Chalmers, D., and Abraham, C. (2005). Strategies for effective dissemination of project outcomes: A report for the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. The U of Queensland and Flinders University.
Tatalovic, M. (2008). “Student science publishing: an exploratory study of undergraduate science research journals and popular science magazines in the US and Europe,” Journal of Science Communication, 7(3), http://jcom.sissa.it/.
The Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (2007). What’s Happening in Science? Sydney.
Trench, B. (2008). "Science reporting in the internet's electronic embrace." In Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for public engagement and popular media, eds. R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, and J. Thomas. Oxford University Press.
Turney, J. (1994). “Teaching science communication: Courses, curricula, theory and practice,” Public Understanding of Science, 3, 435 - 443.
UNESCO. 2003. Science for the 21st century: a vision and basis for action; World Conference Declaration on Science and the Use of Scientific Knowledge, scientific agenda, action plan, Budapest and Santo Domingo, 1999. -- Brasília: UNESCO, Available from:http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001315/131550e.pdf
Wellcome Trust/ MORI. 2000. The role of scientists in public debate. London: Wellcome Trust.



Useful resources

Skillcity is a collection of materials to help teach university students. Materials may be uploaded and shared or downloaded by lecturers for use in teaching.
Links to other resources are found in the relevant pages of this wiki.